The bench said “prima facie”, the construction was “impermissible” and violated the Wild Life (Protection) Act and the National Wetlands (Conservation …
Read More at Source.
Read More at Source.
Read More at Source.
Read More at Source.
Read More at Source.
Read More at Source.
Read More at Source.
Read More at Source.
Read More at Source.
Read More at Source.
Read More at Source.